<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3000 England Fans Can Be Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html</link>
	<description>Chronicling the Soca Warriors' World Cup 2006 adventures in Germany</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:35:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dickon</title>
		<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>Dan

You really ARE a moron aren&#039;t you!!!

IF they were still at 0-0 then T&amp;T would have been playing more defensive ... thus more players behind the ball ... thus more effort and opportunity to stop long range shots ... thus a CHANCE to stop even the second goal - which of course would have been the first.

AND at 0-0 Stevie might have decided to not risk a long range shot, which could have been their last attack, and instead try the same thing as he had ALL GAME UP UNTIL THE FIRST GOAL and passed it wide instead.

Q.E.D. - Final score 0-0

Comprenda ?
Entiendes ??
Understand ???
Catch my drift ????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan</p>
<p>You really ARE a moron aren&#8217;t you!!!</p>
<p>IF they were still at 0-0 then T&amp;T would have been playing more defensive &#8230; thus more players behind the ball &#8230; thus more effort and opportunity to stop long range shots &#8230; thus a CHANCE to stop even the second goal &#8211; which of course would have been the first.</p>
<p>AND at 0-0 Stevie might have decided to not risk a long range shot, which could have been their last attack, and instead try the same thing as he had ALL GAME UP UNTIL THE FIRST GOAL and passed it wide instead.</p>
<p>Q.E.D. &#8211; Final score 0-0</p>
<p>Comprenda ?<br />
Entiendes ??<br />
Understand ???<br />
Catch my drift ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html#comment-946</guid>
		<description>Hold up a second, in your earlier post, you say &quot;With that goal disallowed T&amp;T would have played the last few minutes with more defence to hold on to a much deserved point, true of false? TRUE&quot;

Erm, that is actually false because Gerarrd scored so it would still have been 1 - 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold up a second, in your earlier post, you say &#8220;With that goal disallowed T&amp;T would have played the last few minutes with more defence to hold on to a much deserved point, true of false? TRUE&#8221;</p>
<p>Erm, that is actually false because Gerarrd scored so it would still have been 1 &#8211; 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickon</title>
		<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Dan

&quot;Just a matter of time&quot; - but with 83 minutes already gone their time had almost ran out.

They defended against Sweden for the full 90 minutes, are you saying that what the England couldnt do in 83 minutes without cheating they were guaranteed to do in the next 7 regardless of if they cheat or not ... do me a favour.

If you cant turn possession into opportunity and score from it then you dont deserve to qualify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan</p>
<p>&#8220;Just a matter of time&#8221; &#8211; but with 83 minutes already gone their time had almost ran out.</p>
<p>They defended against Sweden for the full 90 minutes, are you saying that what the England couldnt do in 83 minutes without cheating they were guaranteed to do in the next 7 regardless of if they cheat or not &#8230; do me a favour.</p>
<p>If you cant turn possession into opportunity and score from it then you dont deserve to qualify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html#comment-938</guid>
		<description>England&#039;s goal was just a matter of time, it&#039;s just unfortunate Crouch commited a foul in order to get his.  The entire Second half England where clearly the dominant side, you can&#039;t deny that just because of Crouch&#039;s hair pulling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>England&#8217;s goal was just a matter of time, it&#8217;s just unfortunate Crouch commited a foul in order to get his.  The entire Second half England where clearly the dominant side, you can&#8217;t deny that just because of Crouch&#8217;s hair pulling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickon Springate</title>
		<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickon Springate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html#comment-927</guid>
		<description>Binarybloke

I&#039;m getting just a little bit pissed off with you.

Binary .. that is computer jargon right ... as it zero or one.

In some computer programs it has been used for true of false as well.

What crouch did was fair, true or false? FALSE

With that goal disallowed T&amp;T would have played the last few minutes with more defence to hold on to a much deserved point, true of false? TRUE

If after 82 minutes England could not honorably break down the T&amp;T defence it is possible that playing to defend they could have lasted the fanal few minutes, true or false? TRUE

With only a total of 4 points, and one goal, it would really show that England are a second rate team and would have to improve and beat Sweden for a guaranteed chance of qualifying, true of false? TRUE

T&amp;T would have a much better chance of qualifying with 2 points and both Sweden and England on 4 points than with only one point, true or false? TRUE

You are a pathetic muppet, with no decency or romantisism in your soul and will surely have few true friends that actually like you, true or false? Most definetly true.

Just go away and go play with traffic or something equally hazardous to your health and leave the Soca Warriors to the fans that want it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Binarybloke</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting just a little bit pissed off with you.</p>
<p>Binary .. that is computer jargon right &#8230; as it zero or one.</p>
<p>In some computer programs it has been used for true of false as well.</p>
<p>What crouch did was fair, true or false? FALSE</p>
<p>With that goal disallowed T&amp;T would have played the last few minutes with more defence to hold on to a much deserved point, true of false? TRUE</p>
<p>If after 82 minutes England could not honorably break down the T&amp;T defence it is possible that playing to defend they could have lasted the fanal few minutes, true or false? TRUE</p>
<p>With only a total of 4 points, and one goal, it would really show that England are a second rate team and would have to improve and beat Sweden for a guaranteed chance of qualifying, true of false? TRUE</p>
<p>T&amp;T would have a much better chance of qualifying with 2 points and both Sweden and England on 4 points than with only one point, true or false? TRUE</p>
<p>You are a pathetic muppet, with no decency or romantisism in your soul and will surely have few true friends that actually like you, true or false? Most definetly true.</p>
<p>Just go away and go play with traffic or something equally hazardous to your health and leave the Soca Warriors to the fans that want it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binarybloke</title>
		<link>http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html/comment-page-1#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Binarybloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinidadtobago.worldcupblog.org/1/3000-england-fans-can-be-wrong.html#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Er, I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
